Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad H
Is it likely that any track with banking > 14 deg will require less neg camber. Your post suggests -4 is the minimum negative camber you would ever use, but I can't seem to get good setups for the banked short tracks using chassis 3 with this rule.
|
I've only run cup tracks with chassis 3, which doesn't include any with more banking than Richmond. Maybe it works like in SW chassis and you need more positiver camber if you race at tracks with more banking, maybe -7° actually works best everywhere, no idea.
Quote:
|
Also, for chassis 3, is it true that the shorter the track, the less likely you need rear spring split / trackbar. (I am comparing your Martinsville (no rear spring split / trackbar) with your Richmond / Phoenix etc)?
|
It's mainly the radius of the corners I think; in very tight corners you'll rather have issues bringing the power down on exit, whereas there is usually a problem with understeer in the center and exiting long sweeping corners.