Volker,
In relation to your advice regarding camber...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volker Hackmann
With ST chassis, -7° of RF camber works best at most tracks, Richmond is an exception where I only use -4°. I wouldn't expect to run it even more positive than that anywhere, and generally, less banking requires more negative camber.
|
... I am now trying to build a new setup for Nashville PWF which has 18 degrees of banking. I have found that the inside RF heats up a lot if I run more negative camber than -4 deg, and making a trackbar / rear spring split adjustment to compensate makes me oversteer coming off turns 2 and 4 (I didn't try negative rear spring split with trackbar as this seemed offsetting).
Is it likely that any track with banking > 14 deg will require less neg camber. Your post suggests -4 is the minimum negative camber you would ever use, but I can't seem to get good setups for the banked short tracks using chassis 3 with this rule.
Also, for chassis 3, is it true that the shorter the track, the less likely you need rear spring split / trackbar. (I am comparing your Martinsville (no rear spring split / trackbar) with your Richmond / Phoenix etc)?
Sorry to bug you with so many dumb questions! Your help is always appreciated.
Thanks
Brad